CHILDREN who nap beyond the age of two are more likely to have problems sleeping through the night, research has suggested.
A study found that daytime napping led to toddlers taking longer to fall asleep in the evening along with reduced sleep quality and duration.
Early childhood is a particularly important period in sleep development and toddlers are often encouraged to take a daytime nap, although by the age of two a child will usually be getting most of their sleep during the night.
Researchers in Australia analysed other relevant studies around the world including one which found that among children attending a nursery school where napping was optional, the onset of sleep was later on evenings following a nap compared with days where they had not taken one.
Napping was also not found to be a response to shorter sleep duration the night before.
Other studies included one which found that longer naps among children aged from four to six were associated with greater anxiety and/or depression and withdrawal, while another made a link between the same symptoms and difficulty in settling for naps in children aged one to three.
But the report, published in Archives of Disease in Childhood, found the relationship between napping and its effects on other aspects of children's development to be less clear.
The work was led by Professor Karen Thorpe, of the School of Psychology and Counselling at Queensland University, who said further research involving more systematic studies should be carried out.
"The duration and quality of sleep have immediate, ongoing and long-term consequences for child development and health," she said.
"During early childhood, sleep patterns affect the individual child and can also have a profound effect on family functioning and parent well-being.
"The impact of night sleep on children's development and health is increasingly documented, but to date there is not sufficient evidence to indicate the value of prolonging napping, whether at home or in childcare contexts, once sleep has consolidated into night."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article