MORE than 1,000 Scots are to have their entire genetic make-up decoded to help explain why some people's brains age better than others.
The DNA analysis will help researchers at Edinburgh University determine the impact that a person's genetic make-up has on their ability to stay sharp in old age.
The participants will come from the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936, a group of individuals from Edinburgh who were born in 1936 and took part in school mental tests as 11-year-olds.
These exam results have been combined with studies of each individual's thinking skills and health over the past decade, forming a major study into how mental ability in youth affects the brain in later life.
As well as regularly resitting the school mental test, the cohort have taken many cognitive tests and medical examinations, including blood and ultrasound checks, brain scans, eye examinations and fitness assessments.
By linking these test results with information about their genetic make-up, scientists hope the study will give new insights into the factors underlying healthy ageing.
Edinburgh University's Roslin Institute and Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology have received £1m from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council to fund the study.
Professor Ian Deary, director of the Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, said: "As well as lifestyle factors and health, we think that genetic factors contribute to why some people's brains and thinking skills age better than others. Until now, our genetic testing of the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 has been patchy. This new award will allow us comprehensively to examine people's genetic status, and will add further value to the rich data provided by these dedicated participants. My Centre is delighted to be working with the Roslin Institute on this large scale and important new part of the project."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article