THE number of households expected to be hit by the new £500 a week benefits cap has fallen by one-quarter, the UK Government has revealed.
Initial estimates had suggested 56,000 people would be affected by the controversial limit, losing an average of around £90 per week. However, the forecast has now been cut to 40,000.
Officials suggested that 8000 people had found jobs while others had moved to cheaper properties.
"The benefits cap sets a clear limit for how much support the welfare state will provide: the average wage for working households," said Iain Duncan Smith, the Work and Pensions Secretary. "But it's also a strong incentive for people to move into work and, even before the cap comes in, we are seeing thousands of people seeking help and moving off benefits."
He added: "We have a very clear message: we will provide support to those who need it but the days of outrageous claims giving people incomes far above those of working families are over."
The benefits cap is due to be introduced in four London boroughs from Monday; just under half of all the households expected to be affected are in the UK capital. Nationwide implementation will begin in July with the policy fully in force by the end of September.
The cap was originally expected to save £275 million a year from the welfare bill but it is now estimated to save only £110m.
Total welfare payments will be limited to £500 per week for couples and single parents and £350 per week for single people without children.
This means that workless households will not receive more in benefits than the average earnings of working households.
The Government has made clear the rise in the amount spent on working age benefits has to be slowed; in 2009/10 some £90 billion was paid out in benefit payments to people of working age and their families.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article