GLASGOW City Council's car parking company has secured yet another bailout, a £2 million loan from the local authority, after posting its seventh annual loss since its creation.
City Parking ended 2013-14 more than £720,000 in the red after its operating profits failed to cover interest on the huge loans it took out to buy its car parks from the council.
Accounts filed at Companies House show the city, its owner, gave it the loan during the year to keep it afloat. This facility replaces a rolling credit of the same amount, and must be paid off by 2035.
The company has now lost £28m since it was set up by former council leader Steven Purcell in 2007 as a cash-cow. It has never raised enough in operational profit to cover the cost of its £45m loan to pay for the council's four main multi-storey car parks.
City Parking last year went firmly into negative equity after it emerged its mortgages were twice as high as its buildings' actual value. That led to an impairment in its accounts of £22m, the main reason for its historic losses.
A Glasgow City Council spokesman: said: "City Parking made an operational profit last year. As is standard, for accounting purposes, depreciation has to be included as part of the statutory accounts process. The £2m loan from the council, which City Parking pays interest on, has replaced an existing temporary rolling credit facility which has been repaid to the bank."
Glasgow SNP leader of the opposition Councillor Susan Aitken said: "From day one, the SNP have had concerns about the viability of the business case behind City Parking. The company has had to be propped up by financial support in the recent past from the council and is hamstrung by loans to the banks.
''It's time for a root-and-branch review of City Parking. There is a serious problem with City Parking and throwing good money after bad, year after year, will not fix it."
City Parking remains firmly a going concern and there is no suggestion that it is not good for its debts.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article