MORE than 40 quango chiefs are paid more than the First Minister's £141,000 annual salary, research has found.
About 130 people working for public bodies receive more than a Cabinet Secretary's salary of £101,000, while almost 700 are paid more than an MSP's salary of £58,000.
The think-tank Reform Scotland, which carried out the study, believes quangos "are not sufficiently accountable to the Scottish Parliament or the Scottish people".
Quasi-autonomous non-governmental organisations lead the delivery of public services in Scotland including culture, healthcare, the environment and justice.
They are managed by boards whose members are directly appointed by Government ministers.
Freedom of Information requests were sent to all 72 of Scotland's quangos, with 61 replying. Some 43 executives are paid more than the First Minister, 132 are paid more than a Cabinet Secretary and 686 are paid more than an MSP.
Although health boards are classed as quangos, only the salaries of board members were taken into consideration for the report.
Reform Scotland believes all quangos, with the exception of tribunals, should either become fully independent of government or have their functions transferred to existing government departments. Research director Alison Payne said: "Scotland needs to end its love affair with quangos."
The Scottish Government said since October 2007, the number of devolved public bodies had reduced from 199 to 113, exceeding the Government target of a 25 per cent reduction."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article