Almost half of people will be persuaded to vote for independence if they are convinced they will be better off, a poll has found.
It suggests that 47% will support independence if they believe they will be £500 a year better off, compared with just over a third who will oppose it (37%) and around one in six who do not know (16%).
In contrast, only one in five will back independence (18%) if they think they will be £500 a year worse off, compared with two in three who will support remaining part of the UK (66%) and around one in six do not know (15%).
Commissioned by The Scotsman and Scotland on Sunday newspapers, the ICM poll questioned 1,002 people between September 10 and 13.
It comes as the country approaches a year to go before the referendum next September.
Asked to consider how they will vote if they knew that the result of the referendum leaves them no better or worse off financially, 39% back independence, 44% oppose it and 17% do not know.
Around half say they think independence will be bad for the economy (48%), three in 10 think it will be good for the economy (31%), around one in 20 think there will be no difference (6%) and one in seven do not know (14%), according to the poll published at the weekend.
It also suggests that 49% of people would vote No, 32% would vote Yes and 19% do not know how they would vote on the referendum question: Should Scotland be an independent country?
Commenting on the poll, SNP deputy leader and Deputy First Minister Nicola Sturgeon said: "This is a welcome finding, underlining that people in Scotland know we've got what it takes to be an independent country.
"Scotland generates 9.9% of UK tax revenues and gets 9.3% of spending in return, and the most recent Government Expenditure and Revenue Scotland report showed that Scotland's finances are stronger than the UK's as a whole to the tune of £4.4 billion which equates to £824 per person.
"We are extremely confident, therefore, of demonstrating that we can build a more successful economy and fairer society with the powers of an independent Scotland."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article