More than 62,000 people had signed a petition calling for a women's Tour de France version to be staged the day after Chris Froome rode into the history books as Britain's second consecutive winner of the race.
Britain's former world champion and 2008 Olympic time trial silver medallist Emma Pooley is one of four top riders who published a petition to resurrect the event, which has not been held since 2009.
The letter to Tour director Christian Prudhomme calls for women to be on the starting line of the 101st Tour de France in 2014, stating: "Hopefully 30 years from now, we will see 2014 as the year that opened people's eyes to true equality in the sport of cycling."
The petition, launched this month by Pooley, Olympic road race champion Marianne Vos, Kathryn Bertine and ironman triathlon champion Chrissie Wellington, had 62,683 signatures by 2pm today.
British Cycling president Brian Cookson , who is challenging Ireland's Pat McQuaid for the Presidency of the International Cycling Union (UCI), has described a permanent women's Tour as a "great" idea but feels it might need to be "over modified distances, modified number of days, and so on".
He suggested that while more high profile and serious competitions could be good for the sport there may be "some serious logistical problems and organisational problems" with adding a women's event to the Tour de France.
The petition states: "After a century, it is about time women are allowed to race the Tour de France, too.
"While many women's sports face battles of inequity, road cycling remains one of the worst offenders: fewer race opportunities, no televised coverage, shorter distances, and therefore salary and prize money inequity.
"We seek not to race against the men, but to have our own professional field running in conjunction with the men's event, at the same time, over the same distances, on the same days, with modifications in start/finish times so neither gender's race interferes with the other."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article