ONE million UK workers may be on controversial zero-hours contracts, according to new research.
The figure, four times the official estimate, has been produced by the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) after it surveyed 1000 employers.
It found one in five had at least one worker on a zero-hours contract, under which staff are not guaranteed a set amount of work.
Firms in the voluntary and public sectors, as well as the hotel, leisure and catering industries were more likely to use such contracts.
Separately, almost 150 zero-hours contract workers said their employer failed to give them enough work to have a basic standard of living.
The workers polled averaged just under 20 hours a week and were most likely to be aged between 18 and 24 or over 55.
The Office for National Statistics (ONS) said last week 250,000 people in the UK were on zero-hours contracts at the end of last year, 50,000 more than a previous estimate.
CIPD chief executive Peter Cheese said: "Zero-hours contracts are a hot topic and our research suggests they are being used more commonly than the ONS figures would imply. However, the assumption that all zero-hours contracts are bad and the suggestion from some quarters that they should be banned should be questioned.
"There does need to be a closer look at what is meant by a zero-hours contract, the different forms that they take, and clearer guidance."
Business Secretary Vince Cable has ordered a review of zero-hours contracts, saying little is known about their impact on firms and staff.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article