CAMPAIGNERS are celebrating a major victory in a long-running battle with landowners over the destruction of woodland.
Members of the Helensburgh Community Woodlands Group have been fighting for more than 18 months to have around 100 trees replanted at a local greenspace which it claims has become an eyesore.
Argyll and Bute Council has now imposed a replanting order on landowners Margery Osborne and Thomas Paterson, who removed the greenery from the town's Cumberland Avenue in June 2011.
The campaigners said they were delighted with the decision after months of protesting.
Ms Osborne and Mr Paterson now have until November this year to replant 109 trees of the exact same species on the land in roughly the same spot from where they were removed.
Professor David Adams, convener of the group, said: "Local people have shown remarkable patience over the past 18 months while Argyll and Bute Council has investigated what we have always considered to have been the unlawful felling of trees at Cumberland Avenue.
"There are around 70 or 80 members in the group and, I've got to be honest, a lot of them were a bit cynical about the process with the council.
"They weren't expecting a great deal but now we're delighted with the decision and are pleased our efforts have paid off."
Mr Adams, who is also chairman of Property and Urban Studies at Glasgow University, added: "The owners have been issued with a formal notice to replant over 100 trees by November 15, 2013, together with a very detailed set of instructions on how this should be done properly.
"These instructions include the requirement to clear the debris away from the site before replanting takes place. We trust the owners will now take their responsibilities seriously and work with the council and in accordance with the wishes of local people to put right the eyesore they created in 2011."
The campaigners have held a number of protests at the site since the trees were removed and submitted a 250-signature petition to the council.
They also secured the support of a number of local politicians in their plight to have the woodland returned to its former glory.
The replanting order was formally issued by the council this month after councillors found there was a Tree Preservation Order in place at the site.
The order states: "The council did not consent to the removal, uprooting or destruction of the trees.
"The council has not received notice in writing that operations to uproot or fell the trees were urgently necessary in the interest of safety, or necessary for the prevention or abatement of a nuisance, and the operations were not therefore authorised."
It also claims the removal of the trees has 'resulted in the loss of a valuable and attractive amenity woodland'".
The document adds: "The harm caused by the unauthorised works is considered serious and the harm to amenity so substantial as to justify the actions required."
It is understood that, prior to the removal of the trees, Ms Osborne and Mr Paterson applied for planning permission on the site but the application was refused.
The landowners are currently appealing against the council's order, and they declined to comment until the process is complete.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article