Confidence in the two new financial services regulators will be at risk unless more is done to attract and retain staff, the public spending watchdog has warned.
According to the National Audit Office (NAO), more than a third of staff at the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) have less than two years' service at the regulator and its predecessor, the Financial Services Authority (FSA).
And it noted that 26% of those who have resigned from the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) were classed as 'high-performers'. Staff turnover at the PRA stood at 11.7% last year, while the figure for the FCA was 9.7%.
The NAO said: "There is a risk this may begin to undermine industry confidence and poses a risk that knowledge within the organisation will be lost."
Following last April's break-up of the FSA, the PRA now undertakes prudential regulation of all banks, building societies, insurers and credit unions, while the FCA is responsible for conduct regulation.
The combined cost of the FCA and PRA is forecast to be £664 million in the current financial year, which is 24% higher than the FSA in 2012-13.
The NAO said the costs should be seen in the context of potential benefits from the regulators acting more effectively to reduce harm to consumers and limiting future taxpayer liabilities.
Amyas Morse, head of the NAO, said: "These are still early days for the new regulators, and there are encouraging signs new approaches are gaining traction.
"Attracting and retaining staff are vital to keeping this progress on track."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article