Broadcaster Andrew Marr today provoked an angry reaction from the SNP after he warned of "Anglophobia" in Scotland ahead of next year's referendum.
Marr spoke about the issue as he launched an updated version of his 1992 publication The Battle For Scotland at the Edinburgh International Book Festival.
The sell-out event was the BBC presenter's first public appearance since he suffered his stroke.
During a lively discussion chaired by journalist Gavin Hewitt, Marr commented on the tone of the independence debate so far, praising the "genius" of First Minister Alex Salmond and warning against using current polls to predict the result of the 2014 referendum.
While polls have shown a majority of Scots want to stay in the UK, Marr said next year's referendum would be "much closer than the polls suggest" and there was still a "lot to play for".
Commenting on the tone of debate, Marr touched on the experience of Ukip leader Nigel Farage, who was hounded by protesters during a visit to Edinburgh earlier this year.
"There is a very strong anti-English feeling (in Scotland), everybody knows it, there always has been," he said.
"If you go back to the origins of the SNP, the origins of home rule, Anglophobia was as well-entrenched then as it is now.
"I don't think it is particularly serious most of the time, but it can become serious, it can become toxic."
He praised Mr Salmond, whom he said had continued to wrong-foot his political opponents over the years. He suggested the SNP leader had a plan for next year and warned against complacency among the leaders of the unionist parties.
"I think he (Alex Salmond) is some kind of political genius," Marr said
"On the whole he is a brilliant politician. He has now been in power for quite a long time and he is struggling with the gilt rubbing off a little bit.
"All I (am) suggesting is don't write him off, he has a plan for next year. We haven't heard much of it yet, but we will do."
He added: "If you believe the opinion polls, it's going to be overwhelmingly pro-union ... I doubt that.
"I think it's going to be much closer than the polls suggest. There is a huge undecided vote and a lot to play for."
Marr also touched on the consequences of independence for the remainder of the UK, which he said could include the loss of its seat on the UN Security Council, slashing of its voting power in the European Union, a shift in the domestic political landscape and the loss of the Trident nuclear deterrent.
The Glasgow-born journalist also revealed he would choose a Scottish passport should Scotland vote yes next year.
"I am a Scot, so it would have to be a Scottish passport and not an English passport," he said.
An SNP spokesman said: "We are happy to see that Andrew Marr's health is recovering, but we are disappointed by the picture of Scotland he has painted in his reported comments.
"It is simply wrong to suggest that aspirations for Scotland to make our own decisions are based on anything other than a desire to build a fairer, more prosperous Scotland.
"Intolerance of any kind has no place in Scotland and all of us have a duty to stand up to it where it occurs."
Marr, who is due to return to full-time presenting duties this autumn, said his left arm was "still no good" after he was struck down in January, and revealed he is still unable to type after suffering a stroke. As a result, he was forced to use a dictation system to write his latest book.
He was warmly received and told the packed audience: "This is the first time I have had a big event like this since the stroke. I have no idea how it is going to go."
The former political editor spent more than two months in hospital after the stroke and has also undergone extensive physiotherapy to help him walk.
"I can't type because my left arm is still no good," he said.
"I used to touch-type but I can't any more. I used to think I could only think through my fingers."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article