Television presenter Eamonn Holmes has been forced to make an on-air apology after an unblurred image of the front cover of the Italian magazine featuring the Duchess of Cambridge in a bikini ‘accidentally’ appeared on screen.
The image appeared during the news review segment on ITV’s This Morning when the publication of the photographs of pregnant Kate in a bikini on a private Caribbean holiday was being discussed.
The photos, which have been condemned by St James's Palace, were published today by Italian magazine Chi. One of them shows Kate's very slight baby bump as she stands in the sea and is accompanied by the headline "the belly grows". Another shows the Duke, wearing a pair of shorts, with his left arm around his wife as they walk along a beach on the island of Mustique.
Presenter Holmes said: "Earlier during today's news review we were discussing photographs of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge on a beach in Mustique published in an Italian magazine.
"Unfortunately we accidentally showed an unblurred image of the magazine cover, which briefly showed the photographs.
"This was a deeply regrettable error and we are very sorry. We apologise unreservedly to the Duke and the Duchess."
This gaffe comes just months after This Morning presenter Phillip Schofield was roundly criticised after he confronted David Cameron with a list of alleged paedophiles.
He handed the Prime Minister a list of names which he said he had put together from internet rumours - it was understood to be Conservative Party figures - during the live show.
ITV apologised on the next day's show and emphasised it was not pointing the finger at anyone in particular. Schofield was later forced to apologise after the list was briefly exposed on screen.
Broadcasting watchdog Ofcom launched investigations into This Morning's November 8 edition after complaints that it - and BBC's Newsnight - breached "generally accepted standards".
The November 2 Newsnight wrongly implicated a Tory politician in a historic paedophile ring that targeted children at a care home in Wrexham in north Wales.
THE publication of the pictures of the Duchess of Cambridge has been condemned by St James's Palace.
A spokesman said: "This is a clear breach of the couple's right to privacy."
Chi – owned by former Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi – last year caused outrage when it produced a 26-page special showing Kate topless during a holiday in France.
The Duchess's pregnancy has already been plagued by controversy after a prank radio call at the hospital where she was being treated for extreme morning sickness led to the suicide of a nurse.
Meanwhile, the editor of an Australian magazine has defended her decision to print photographs of Kate in a bikini, saying her readers will "love" the images.
Woman's Day is the second publication to use the pictures of the pregnant royal, following magazine Chi.
They were reportedly taken from a boat using a long-lens camera, but Fiona Connolly, editor of Woman's Day, claimed a member of the public snapped the Duchess.
Speaking to Australia's Channel Nine network ahead of publishing the pictures in Monday's edition of the magazine, Ms Connolly said: "This is not a hard decision about these photos. Kate's on a public beach, there are other holiday-makers there and she looks fabulous."
She made a distinction between the new pictures and those taken while Kate was topless on holiday in France last year as the latest ones were not taken at a private location.
"Look, I think the British are very sensitive about this," Ms Connolly told Channel Nine.
"As Australians, we see this every day. We see pregnant women in bikinis on the beach - and a public one at that - so we are a lot less sensitive here in Australia."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article