A REPORT into an anthrax outbreak which killed 14 heroin addicts suggests officials should consider prescribing the drug during any future contaminations.
The National Anthrax Outbreak Control Team (NAOCT) claims the Scottish Government could "usefully give this aspect further consideration" as guidance on the issue would be helpful for Outbreak Control Teams (OCTs) and addiction services.
Report author Dr Colin Ramsay, chairman of NAOCT, said prescribing heroin was suggested as a control strategy during the year-long outbreak – which began in Glasgow in December 2009 – but NAOCT considered the suggestion to be outwith its remit.
He added it was now relevant for consideration by Government officials, but a Government spokeswoman last night said it has "absolutely no such plans".
Dr Ramsay said: "Supplying (prescribed) spore-free heroin to all heroin users in Scotland was suggested as a control strategy.
"The NAOCT considered this suggestion was highly controversial and it would require high level Government consideration from a drug policy perspective.
"The NAOCT therefore considered this issue to be outside the competence of the group and made no recommendation on the matter. The NAOCT expressed no opinion on the merits or risks of advocating such a control measure.
"However, the NAOCT recognised it would be helpful to have definitive guidance on whether or not such an option would be practical as an emergency risk control measure in a future outbreak involving illicit heroin or other drugs.
"It was therefore considered relevant Government departments could usefully give this aspect further consideration and provide guidance for future OCTs."
The outbreak was the largest of its kind in the UK for more than 50 years and saw 119 patients in Scotland being classed as anthrax cases. It was also the first outbreak associated with heroin use anywhere in the world.
Dr Ramsay said: "The illicit nature of the heroin supply considered responsible for transmitting the infection, together with the illegal drug trafficking trade, limited the options for intervention and made control of the outbreak very difficult.
"Conventional options normally available to an outbreak control team to enforce eradication of a contaminant at source, or to remove contaminated material from supply, were not available in this situation."
He added: "As long as there is an illicit drug trade, the risk of further such outbreaks will continue; opportunities for their primary prevention are likely to remain limited."
The outbreak began when an injecting drug addict presented at hospital with a severe soft tissue infection in December 2009. A few days later, the infection was linked to anthrax.
A total of 208 expected cases were then seen over the next year, with 119 confirmed, probable or possible cases.
The report concluded the anthrax came from contaminated heroin, likely imported from Afghanistan or Pakistan, with an infected animal hide used to transport the drugs the most probable cause.
A Scottish Government spokeswoman said the report and its recommendations, which also included improving capabilities for identifying anthrax and better advice for drug users, were now being considered.
She said: "As with all outbreaks and public health incidents, it is essential we capture the experience and learn lessons from it. We will consider the recommendations contained within this report and respond accordingly."
Asked if that meant considering the prescription of controlled drugs during any future outbreaks, she replied: "We have absolutely no such plans."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article