Apple is "at pains to stress its quality and power", experts said today as the tech giant introduced two new iPhones in an apparent bit to claim ground from its rivals.
But observers suggested the tech giant's decision to introduce a budget device "could well be the trump card needed to trounce Android's hand".
Stuart Miles, editor of gadget website Pocket-Lint, predicted the cheap device would be snapped up but could be viewed as a new take on an earlier iPhone.
"The 5C is obviously a device that is aimed at being a lot more colourful and youthful and designed to appeal to a global market," he said.
"I think it will sell incredibly well however those that want to criticise it will say that ultimately it is a souped up version of the iPhone 3G."
He predicted the 5S would also become a popular handset at a time when "nobody else is doing fingerprint scanning".
"There are no gimmicks here - you'll use the scanner even if it's just to unlock your phone."
Adrian Drury, an analyst a research firm Ovum, branded the high-end model a "halo device designed to set a new bar for mobile computing".
"While the IPhone 5C is the new lower cost device in the range, Apple is at pains to stress its quality and power," he said.
"This is a device designed to revolutionise smartphone market shares."
Meanwhile he said the faster 5S would "set new stakes for gaming on a smartphone" while the security sensor ensures iTunes purchases are "now just a fingertip away".
Ernest Doku, of comparison uSwitch.com, also hailed the advanced model, adding the Apple's "rock-bottom" pricing injected a "modicum of surpass" into its latest announcements.
He added: "Apple's never had an offering for the mid-range smartphone market, leaving Samsung - with a phone for every budget - to clean up. The 5C could well be the trump card needed to trounce Android's hand."
Jason Jenkins, editor of technology site CNET, said Apple has made a play for the "geeks" it "lost" to Android with the 5S.
"Android phones like the Samsung Galaxy S4 and HTC One are known for containing very fast processors, while iPhones have been left behind," he said.
"By using a technology called 64-bit processing, Apple is hoping to leapfrog the competition and attract the high-spending, nerdy crowd that like owning a phone that is technically faster than everyone else's."
He said the plastic iPhone 5S "looks to be a good buy" but was "nowhere near as cheap as we were hoping for".
The handset costs 99 dollars (£63) with a two-year contract or £469.
Stephen Ebbett, global director of gadget insurer Protect Your Bubble, warned earlier models that have sported fingerprint scanners have proved temperamental.
"Apple's budget iPhone is a first for the manufacturer that, until now, has offered only top-of-the-range handsets," he said.
"Although the 5C is Apple's attempt to grow its customer base in the developing markets, it could well be the younger audience that buys into the budget device - firstly, because it comes in an array of fun colours, but also because this phone is practically teenager-proof with its tough steel frame and polycarbonate body.
"As rumoured, Apple's iPhone 5S introduces Touch ID, using touch-based fingerprint sensors - but this could turn out to be more a gimmick than an impenetrable security measure at this stage.
"Being able to use fingerprint security login for iTunes purchases is a nice touch, if it works. And with the rise of wireless payment technology, the mobile space is crying out for better security.
"But while biometrics are typically seen as more robust than password protection - sweat, dirty pockets, hot and cold environments, sun exposure, and other factors can affect the sensitivity and working conditions of the sensor surface."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article