The winning architect whose vision for one of Scotland's greatest public spaces was effectively blocked by the city's leader has appealed to the public to help resurrect the plans.
John McAslan of John McAslan and Partners – whose firm won a high profile competition to redesign Glasgow's George Square – met around 20 people in the rain to hear their views.
He revealed two slight design changes, of more greenery and less limestone, to create a less linear approach.
Mr McAslan said he wanted to "rescue" the project by listening to and engaging with residents.
As reported this month, Gordon Matheson pulled the plug on plans for a £15 million makeover of the square, despite a winning design being chosen.
Rivals reportedly claimed Councillor Matheson dropped the redevelopment after his preferred design option did not win.
Mr McAslan said the decision had undermined the competition process, but he was willing to engage with plans for the Square. He said: "I would like to see something happen. I am from Glasgow, I was born in Glasgow, all my family is from Glasgow, my great-grandfather wrote the history of Glasgow in 1920, so it is in my blood, and to me you wouldn't get a better commission than George Square, because it is where I am from.
"It is all very personal. It is not about money it is about trying to do what you think is the right thing.
"It [the decision] undermines the process, it undermines his officers, it undermines the jury, but I would like to draw a line under it."
Mr McAslan said he was hopeful of a meeting with Mr Matheson in order to meet a "positive outcome".
On January 9, when the designs went on display at the Lighthouse centre in Glasgow, Mr Matheson said the public were behind the changes, including a controversial plan to remove the historic statues.
However, when Mr McAslan's design was named the winner, Mr Matheson made a very public U-turn, claiming public opinion had led him to scrap the project in favour of a smaller scale upgrade in time for the 2014 Commonwealth Games.
Michael Doran, 56, from Pollok, Glasgow, said: "It would be great if they could visualise it as a piazza, a place where people can stand about, even enter- tainment, there are plenty of buskers in Glasgow."
Helen Reeves, 44, from the south side of Glasgow said the U-turn was embarrassing for the city. She said: "I think it is a real shame to have an initial com-petition take place and then they just say 'no, we have decided not to'."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article