IT'S a "blue sky" idea where the grey skies of Scotland's largest city wouldn't matter.
Following the unveiling of the six finalists for Glasgow's new George Square, a team of architects has proposed a redesign of the Victorian City Chambers to make it the focal point of the city's civic space.
The plans would see the historic quadrangle, which is used as a car park for councillors, covered and transformed into a new public space for civic events and receptions.
The redesign of the courtyard would be based on the recent extension to the British Museum by Sir Norman Foster.
It is estimated the scheme could cost £10 million, on top of the £15m being spent on George Square, but the team behind it believes it would pay for itself through increased tourist footfall and renting the space for events. The proposal would not change the fabric of the A-listed building but would see a new glazed roof lowered on to it.
A longer-term proposal involves closing off the square outside the City Chambers and moving the Cenotaph to the opposite end of the square.
The vision has been unveiled days before the winning design in the international competition to revamp the square is due to be announced. Council leader Gordon Matheson has met the architects and while he is understood to have look favourably on them, the council insists its priority is George Square itself.
Paul Stallan, of Stallan-Brand architects, said the Chambers was "a truly magnificent building that is effectively closed to the general public" and that while there are tours at certain times, "the building could do so much more for the citizens of Glasgow".
A city council spokesman said: "We're delighted this firm has taken an interest. However, it's not something we're planning on implementing."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article