Painter Jack Vettriano has criticised the art establishment for snubbing his work.
The 63-year-old's paintings have been criticised as "brainless" and "dim erotica" by critics, but sell at auction for hundreds of thousands of pounds.
The Scottish artist told Radio Times magazine: "They don't like an artist who is as popular as me because it takes away part of their authority. If they want to ignore me, let them.
"I have what I want and that is the support of the public and that means far more to me than the approval of a bunch of well-educated art buffs."
Vettriano's painting The Singing Butler, featuring a couple dancing on a beach despite an approaching storm, was rejected for display at the Royal Academy summer exhibition - but fetched almost £750,000 at auction years later.
"The person who made that decision ought to go and live in a cave somewhere," Vettriano said of its omission from the Royal Academy show. "That painting has since sold over 10 million copies. How could somebody get something so wrong?"
The artist, who often paints women in stockings, heels and suspenders, said: "There are days when I think, 'What is it they (critics) don't like about me?'
"To be honest with you I just don't think they see sex as a serious subject. If I was painting drug use or inner-city violence they'd consider that to be art.
"They think what I paint is just titillation. It's not titillation, it's what every couple does on a Saturday night".
Vettriano, who is thought to have sold around 12 million posters of his works, recently enjoyed a retrospective at Glasgow's Kelvingrove Art Gallery and Museum.
Hollywood star Jack Nicholson and Sir Alex Ferguson are among owners of his work.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article