ASSAULTS on police officers are up almost 10 per cent as overall violent crime slumps.
There were more than 6,000 such attacks in 2013-14, according to figures, up from 5,555 the year before.
Calum Steele, general secretary of the Scottish Police Federation, suggested the effort put in by modern officers made them more exposed to attacks.
He said: "Officers are now working longer and harder than ever before. Any assault on a police officer is completely unacceptable. It should be considered as an attack on civil society itself, and dealt with in the harshest way by the courts."
The federation, effectively the union for police rank and file, has long highlighted the violence and threat of violence routinely faced by its members.
Police insiders stress that the definition of assault varies across the UK. Scotland, for example, has four times as many such incidents as the entire Metropolitan Police, which is twice the size. Assaults in Scotland appear to include some verbal incidents.
However, Graeme Pearson, Labour MSP and a former senior police officer, stressed that definitions were unlikely to have changed to explain the recent rise. He said: "There is a real question why all other crimes are going down but assaults on officers and other public servants are going up."
A Police Scotland spokesman said: "Assaults can take the form of a verbal assault, being spat at, a physical assault or assault with a weapon, and can happen during the course of arresting an individual, an individual resisting arrest or as an officer is responding and an individual becomes violent or confrontational.
"The safety and welfare of our officers is a priority and they are trained to a high level, issued with personal protective equipment and undergo regular refresher training."
The police spokesman stressed improvements in uniforms and safety equipment helped to keep officers safe.
Police Scotland said there had been a 10 per cent drop in violent crime overall.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article