NEARLY four in five Scots believe it is important for controversial proposals on assisted suicide to become law, a poll has suggested.
The research, for My Life, My Death My Choice, an umbrella organisation set up in support of the Assisted Suicide (Scotland) Bill, found 78 per cent of those questioned said it was either of "high importance" or "middling importance" that the proposed legislation is passed by the Scottish Parliament.
Campaigners for and against the Bill are to put their cases to MSPs on Holyrood's Health Committee, who have been charged with scrutinising the plans being championed by Green MSP Patrick Harvie following the death of independent Margo MacDonald.
Details of the poll came as it emerged two elderly cousins Stuart Henderson, 86, and Phyllis McConachie, 89, from Troon ended their lives in a Swiss suicide clinic as they feared being sent to different nursing homes as their health deteriorated.
The cousins had lived together for 40 years. But they travelled to an assisted-dying organisation in Basel, where they were given lethal medication and died holding hands in November last year
Reacting to the poll, Dr Peter Saunders, campaign director of Care Not Killing, the umbrella group spearheading the fight against the proposed legislation, urged MSPs to take the lessons of the Holocaust to heart.
Dr Saunders, who will give evidence to MSPs on the committee, said: "The lessons are clear. The Holocaust had small beginnings and advanced in a series of imperceptibly small steps. The medical profession accepted its basic premises - that there is such a thing as 'a life not worth living' and that killing such people was 'an act of mercy' - and failed to protest whilst a small section of its members actively acquiesced to involvement.
"We should take these lessons to heart as we contemplate a change in the law to allow doctors help people take their own lives."
Dr Saunders, a surgeon who is also chief executive of the Christian Medical Fellowship, claimed: "The many similarities between Germany in the 1930s and the direction Western medicine is moving today give great cause for alarm."
Bob Scott, a spokesman for My Life, My Death, My Choice, argued that over the past 12 months there had been "consistently high support for the Assisted Suicide (Scotland) Bill".
He stated: "This has been clearly demonstrated in the poll in 2014 showing 69 per cent support, the 74 pre cent of submissions to the Health & Sport Committee asking the legislation to be passed and the nearly 4,000 people who have signed a petition to MSPs in favour of the Bill.
"Last year, we were told by opponents of the Bill that the issue wasn't of real importance to the public. With 78 per cent saying it is important the Bill be passed, that idea is clearly debunked.
"This legislation has huge public support and is clearly of major importance to the electorate. MSPs need to catch up with public opinion, agree on the principle of this legislation and allow it to proceed to Stage 2 for more detailed discussion."
If approved by Holyrood, the Bill would allow those with terminal or life-shortening illnesses to obtain help in ending their suffering.
It is the second attempt to legalise assisted suicide in Scotland after previous proposals were rejected by MSPs in 2010.
Dr Saunders said polls on the issue could be "easily manipulated", adding that "public opinion is uninformed, uncommitted and unconvincing".
He stated: "Public support for a similar Bill dropped dramatically from 73% to just 43% when the five key arguments against it were heard.
"Polls consistently show between 70% and 80% in support of AS (assisted suicide). However, the issue is clearly far more complex than a simple 'support'/'oppose' question can do justice to.
"When offered evidence about the nature or source of opposition to AS, and some of the key arguments against it, this high level of support rapidly dwindles."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article