THE Government is to force penniless asylum seekers to travel to Liverpool for appointments with immigration officials or face deportation, the Sunday Herald has learned.
In a rule change to be enforced by the Home Office from January 26, the foreign nationals will no longer be permitted to submit evidence that could help their case at local immigration centres.
Immigration and asylum policy is reserved to Westminster, and current employment restrictions mean the majority of asylum seekers are not allowed to work.
The new system has been criticised by the Scottish Government, immigration lawyers and a leading charity that supports refugees who arrive in the UK after fleeing persecution.
Communities Secretary Alex Neil intends to raise his concerns with Home Secretary Theresa May.
The rule change will apply to asylum seekers who have had their initial applications rejected by the Home Office. Many rejected asylum seekers win appeals, but there are fears the new arrangements will deter vulnerable people from fighting to remain in Scotland.
In an official letter to members of the National Asylum Stakeholder Forum from UK Visas and Immigration chief executive Mike Wells, seen by the Sunday Herald, he sets out the policy shift. "From January 26, 2015, we will require all failed asylum seekers wishing to submit further submissions to make an appointment to do so, in person, in Liverpool," said Wells, who includes his CBE award after his signature in the letter dated January 13.
He adds: "The appointments will be requested by telephone. We will aim to make appointments within 10 working days of the initial telephone contact."
Scottish immigration lawyers have insisted most asylum seekers will be unable to scrape together enough cash to pay for expensive travel to and from Liverpool in such a short period of time.
One Glasgow-based solicitor, who asked not to be named, said: "Many people who are required to provide further submissions have received word at short notice that they are to have their benefits stopped completely and are to be made homeless. More often than not they have no permission to work, have no family ties to fall back on.
"The requirement to travel to Liverpool places a huge obstacle in their way to having their claim considered and being able to access support while they await a decision."
Another solicitor, who oversees a team of immigration lawyers in Glasgow and also wished to remain anonymous, called on the Government to reverse the decision.
He said: "The clear aim is to discourage applications. These vulnerable people should be able to hand their submissions in at their local centre and then they can be forwarded to Liverpool."
The Scottish Refugee Council has described the rule change by the UK Visas and Immigration department as "obstructive".
The charity's head of policy Gary Christie said: "People make fresh claims for protection for two main reasons. Firstly, initial decision-making by the Home Office is often flawed, as we've seen by the high rates of initial decisions overturned on appeal.
"Secondly, and crucially, claims for asylum are inherently complex. It is often difficult for people to gather the evidence the Home Office requires to prove that they will be subject to torture, persecution and human rights abuses if they return to their home countries."
Neil said: "I am writing to the Home Secretary to express my strong view that this retrograde step should not be implemented for asylum seekers in Scotland."
A Home Office spokesman said: "These changes will apply only to failed asylum seekers whose claims have already been refused. They will significantly speed up decision-making, enabling us to grant protection more quickly to those who genuinely need it."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article