AUDIENCE members who attended a lecture by Israeli ambassador to the UK Daniel Taub at the University of Glasgow have defended the visit after it was criticised by some staff members.
More than 20 lecturers and professors signed an open letter to The Herald to express their dismay at the decision to invite Mr Taub to speak at the School of Law on the subject of international relations.
The staff members said that his presence on campus would damage relationships made with Palestinian academics and institutions and also criticised the level of security put in place to facilitate the visit, which took place amid protests from pro-Palestinian groups.
However, those who attended talk on Monday said that it was important to hear from all sides of the debate.
Professor Peter Jackson of Global security studies: "It has been a grand success to have such a high calibre speaker on the topic of negotiation. We are for free speech and should be encouraging it.
"I would rather see students passionate about politics and it was a great opportunity for students to have their questions on the issues answered. I could not be happier with how the session went."
Global security student Alex Piscioneri said: "I am grateful that the ambassador visited my university. He is an excellent, articulate speaker and it would be a privilege to have him on my side in a negotiation.
"It is my role as a student to learn, you have to understand both sides and I didn't feel I should have to miss out on the ambassador speaking just because of a few people shouting outside'
Michelle Vanderstighelen, international law masters student, added: "Hearing the ambassador talk was very informative and I learnt a lot that I would never have heard on mainstream news. Each side has to have their own say, their must be open dialogue, I just don't think boycotting speech helps anybody"
The University has also defended the lecture, and said that it plans to host a similar talk by a member of the Palestinian mission to the Uk next month.
ends
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article