Great British Bake Off star Paul Hollywood has criticised the BBC over its handling of Jeremy Clarkson following the Top Gear "fracas".
Clarkson, 55, was effectively axed from the hit show after he attacked a Top Gear producer, with director-general Tony Hall saying "a line has been crossed".
TV judge Hollywood, one of the BBC's biggest stars thanks to Bake Off, told Radio Times magazine: "I'm a car nut and Top Gear was a favourite, I'm really upset about it.
"It was handled wrongly. It could have been dealt with quietly - whether Jeremy left in the end is almost immaterial."
Hollywood, a self-confessed petrolhead, was reported last year to have landed a deal to make a new BBC show about cars and motorbikes.
The TV baker told Radio Times: "I'm actually doing my own programme about cars at the moment. I've got my racing licence, have started racing for Aston Martin and was invited to do Le Mans this year."
James May and Richard Hammond have not signed new Top Gear contracts, and the BBC is reported to have approached former model Jodie Kidd, Life On Mars star Philip Glenister and Channel 4 presenter Guy Martin for a new show.
Asked who he would choose to present a new Top Gear, Hollywood said: "You can't replace those three guys. Change it, don't mimic it.
"Maybe get (racing driver and former Top Gear presenter) Tiff Needell, or the old Stig Ben Collins back. Or Jodie Kidd - it would be nice to have a woman."
Meanwhile, BT Sport presenter Jake Humphrey ruled himself out of the running, telling the magazine: "It's funny because there was me, David Coulthard and Eddie Jordan as a trio and people always used to say to us 'When the Top Gear guys stop, you three should take over!'
"But it's a poisoned chalice at the moment."
ends
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article