THE chief executive of Royal Bank of Scotland has admitted many bankers were paid too much during the financial boom years and he is now keen to make sure wages are "deserved".
Stephen Hester, who earns £1.2 million but waived his near-£1m bonus for last year, said he was keen for remuneration to be linked to things that are "valuable" in the long term.
Mr Hester, who is meeting RBS customers in Scotland, accepts the controversy over bonuses and pay packages in the financial sector is unlikely to go away.
However, he hopes people will start to accept that "people working hard
deserve encouragement" to succeed.
Mr Hester, who declined his bonus after an IT glitch left customers unable to access their accounts, said: "To an extent there is always a noise in society about how the cake is divided up and I don't think we single- handedly will be able to change that noise. I hope we spend more of our time trying to enlarge the size of the cake for everyone, rather than squabbling about how to divide it up.
"In our case the most important thing is to get to the point that people accept a good job is being done at RBS.
"The banking industry as a whole needs to make a better connection between what people get paid and what they do.
"In some cases that means people getting paid less. I think it is true that there were bits of the banking industry where pay was too high for what was being delivered, especially when we now look and see that what was being delivered was maybe a bit inflated.
"Pay in some areas is coming down but my point is less about pay going up or down. Pay should be deserved. It should be linked to things that people do, and those things they do should be valuable and lasting."
Mr Hester said RBS would not get involved in debates over Scotland's constitutional future, but he believes voters need more information from both sides of the debate. He added: "What we must make sure is that we can adapt to the environment the political discussion produces."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article