The rare weapon was
discovered on the site of the battle, in which William Wallace’s Scots army was defeated by the English king Edward I.
The steel “bearded” axe is thought to have belonged to a Scots foot soldier who may have used it the previous year to help win the Battle of Stirling Bridge before dying on the battlefield at Falkirk.
His axe was found centuries later and hung on the wall of a noble’s mansion until it found its way to Lanes Armoury in Brighton, East Sussex.
Mark Hawkins, of the Lanes Armoury, said yesterday: “This was a pretty gruesome thing, designed expressly for combat, to chunk in to people.
“And it was a very effective weapon – a man who knew how to wield a battle axe was a very dangerous opponent.
“An axe like this has an awful lot of metal, so it could be lost on the battlefield and lie buried for hundreds of years relatively intact – unlike a sword which will rot away.”
Medieval bearded axes – so called because of their beard-like appearance – like those used at the Battle of Falkirk, and later also at Bannockburn in 1314, were influenced by the Vikings.
They were a standard weapon for foot soldiers on both sides. Mr Hawkins, a leading expert in antique arms and armour, said: “This was the weapon of a foot soldier – its haft is too long to wield from a horse.
“It was his prized possession, and simply too valuable to discard so it is likely its owner was killed.
“The only alternative is that a small crack visible on the socket occurred on the battlefield and rendered it un-useable.
“When it was found many years later it would not have been of much use, but it was a fabulous looking thing.”
The battle axe is available from Lanes Armoury for £1195.
The Battle of Falkirk, on July 22, 1298, was a disaster for Scotland, with more than 2000 Scots killed.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article