The UK's big four accountancy firms have come under sustained fire from an influential committee of MPs over their work in minimising the tax paid by multi-national companies.
The heads of tax at KPMG, PwC, Ernst & Young and Deloitte were told by Margaret Hodge, chairman of the Commons Public Accounts Committee, that certain activities to reduce tax liabilities were "shocking".
She added that firms which deliberately advise wealthy companies and individuals on how to cut the tax they pay to the Treasury should be barred from receiving lucrative public contracts worth hundreds of millions of pounds a year.
But the accountancy firm executives rejected claims they were marketing "aggressive" tax avoidance schemes to clients and insisted their work benefited the UK by encouraging companies to locate and recruit here.
The bosses appeared for a grilling lasting almost three hours at the House of Commons in the midst of huge controversy over the low tax bills paid by multinationals such as Amazon, Google and Starbucks.
Prime Minister David Cameron last week warned some forms of tax avoidance have become so aggressive that it is right to raise ethical issues and plans to press for action at the G8 summit in Northern Ireland.
Ms Hodge said PwC reported income of £162 million from public sector contracts, Deloitte £159m, KPMG £94.5m and Ernst & Young £72.6m.
"You all get a not insubstantial amount of money from the taxpayer, and yet your main purpose in your tax businesses is to cut the tax paid to the Treasury for the common good," she said. "Do you think you should be excluded from providing services to the public paid for by the taxpayer?"
l Mark Carney, the next Governor of the Bank of England, is to be grilled by the Commons Treasury Committee on Thursday.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article