PUBLIC safety from dangerous buildings will be boosted by plans to make it easier for local authorities to reclaim costs if they are forced to step in, it has been claimed.
For more than a decade councils have had to go through expensive debt recovery to reclaim cash from owners who won't pay up or can't be tracked down.
But now the loophole that caused this is set to be closed, meaning councils are more likely to move on properties when they are at the "grey" stage between defective and dangerous, before they threaten public safety.
Dangerous buildings -from houses to commercial premises and even historic buildings - must be made safe by local authorities, but they have lacked the ability to seek easy financial redress, forcing them down the road of expensive and uncertain civil court action.
Highland Council conv-ener Jimmy Gray raised the issue with Labour MSP David Stewart and now these efforts are taking shape with MSPs backing his Defective and Dangerous Buildings (Recovery of Expenses) Bill.
Mr Stewart cites a number of cases where councils have been left exposed.
In Fife the council spent £300,000 to demolish a precarious building in a tight town centre site, which was at risk of collapse into the street, and struggled to recover its outlay.
A simple charge on a property would mean this bill must be paid at the point of any sale. The proposals would also give home owners decent time to make regular payments to pay the cost.
Mr Stewart said: "The widow in Bearsden is better off because the payments are spread and the cost might be taken out of the later sale of the property. The councils are better off because they have a cheaper way of getting their money back. And local building companies get a boost in terms of repair work. It's a win-win-win whichever way you look at it."
A spokesman for the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities said: "Leaders welcome the approach taken so far by David Stewart MSP and the Scottish Government."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article