Disgraced MSP Bill Walker could lose 90% of his salary if he is jailed for a string of domestic abuse convictions.
The proposal was made at Holyrood by cross-party members looking at wider sanctions available if politicians are sent to prison.
Walker, 71, of Alloa in Clackmannanshire, is due to be sentenced later this month for 24 offences spanning almost three decades, following a trial at Edinburgh Sheriff Court.
The Dunfermline MSP carried out the attacks against his three ex-wives and a stepdaughter between 1967 and 1995.
His refusal to step down has sparked anger among the public and politicians.
Presiding Officer Tricia Marwick alerted MSPs to the proposal by the Scottish Parliament's corporate body (SPCB).
"We recommend that 90% of salary should be withheld for the duration of imprisonment," she wrote in a letter to MSPs.
"I shall therefore be seeking the parliamentary bureau's agreement to bring forward a resolution before parliament next week to amend the salary scheme.
"In recommending this course of action to parliament, it should be made clear we do not seek to encroach upon the role of the courts. Our approach should in no way be interpreted as a punishment - that is for the courts."
The change can be made by resolution of the parliament under section 81(1) as read with section 83(5) of the Scotland Act 1998, she said.
The former SNP MSP, who was ejected from the party when the allegations surfaced, denied the charges.
The law states that any elected member jailed for more than one year will be disqualified. In summary cases heard in sheriff courts in Scotland, the maximum sentence that can be handed down is one year, allowing Walker to remain as an MSP even if he is jailed.
The Scotland Act gives the Scottish Parliament the power to set pay provision, meaning changes could be made by MSPs without referring to Westminster.
Disqualification of a member is a matter for the UK Parliament.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article