A stone circle in Glasgow at the centre of a battle over its future cannot be removed without explosives, its creator has warned.
Duncan Lunan made the claim as he stepped up the battle to save the Sighthill Stone Circle, the first authentically aligned stone circle to have been erected in more than 3000 years.
The landmark in Sighthill Park is being overhauled to make way for a pathway as part of the city's bid to host the 2018 Youth Olympic Games.
But its designer and project manager Mr Lunan told The Herald the attraction was partly encased in a submerged concrete arc and could only be removed by blasting the stones out.
He said it would be far cheaper to renovate the circle and to position its final four unused stones. The largest stone weighs about 4.5 tonnes.
Mr Lunan said: "What the planning people said to me at that time [of the circle's construction in 1979] was they were really worried that vandals would push the stones over. They said they want this thing to be immovable without explosives.
"If they're going to move it now, it would seem they would have to blast it. What a waste. Why not do it up and make it the attraction it was originally meant to be?"
It comes as his campaign group, The Friends of the Sighthill Stone Circle, is to hold a sunset vigil on Saturday to mark the Celtic feast day of Imbolc – midway between the winter solstice and the spring equinox.
The group has attracted more than 2000 signatures on a petition against destruction of the circle.
Glasgow City Council plans to create 830 homes and a new school campus and to demolish tower blocks. One proposal would see the stones removed to make room for a pathway.
Opponents of demolition have included polymath Alasdair Gray, whose seminal novel Lanark is partly set in the area now occupied by the high-rises of Sighthill.
Glasgow MSP Bob Doris has lodged a parliamentary motion to draw attention to the threat.
A council spokesman said: "The council wants the stones to remain in Sighthill Park and we would only consider moving them if they were to ultimately get in the way of the regeneration of the Sighthill area."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article