DISABLED people could be unfairly penalised by reforms to the system that gives them access to preferential parking spaces, lawyers have warned.
The Law Society of Scotland has raised concerns over proposed changes to the blue- badge system, which allows people with reduced mobility to leave their cars in parking bays marked for the disabled.
There are more than one- quarter-of-a-million blue badges in use in Scotland, all issued by local authorities to disabled people who would find it difficult to use public transport.
Dennis Robertson MSP has been consulting on possible new legislation aimed at strengthening the law around the misuse of blue badges, which includes the threat to take them away if they are misused by an able-bodied family member or friend.
Rory McPherson, convener of the society's equalities com-mittee, said: "The blue-badge scheme has been of huge value since it was introduced over 40 years ago and has helped hundreds of thousands of Scots with restricted mobility.
"Mr Robertson and other MSPs are right to look at sensible reforms that help to tackle the fraudulent use of blue badges so we can maintain public confidence in the system and protect parking spaces for genuine badge holders.
"However, the proposals as written risk harming potentially innocent people who have their badges misused by a carer or relative without their knowledge. We simply do not think it fair such people would have their badges confiscated prior to a fair and proper investigation taking place."
Transport Scotland research has shown more than three- quarters of blue-badge holders had experienced misuse of blue badges or disabled persons parking spaces in recent years.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article