UP TO 17 lives a year could be saved under plans to lower the legal drink-drive limit north of the Border, the Scottish Government has claimed.
A consultation aimed at introducing a new limit of 50mg of alcohol per 100ml of blood, down from the current 80mg limit, has the broad support of the public, Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill said.
The move, which could put some drivers over the limit after one glass of wine or a pint of strong lager, would bring Scotland in line with countries such as France, Germany and Spain, but create a difference with England.
Mr MacAskill said: "I think we're expecting support around the chamber. Although it's being driven by the SNP Government, we know that other parties are with us on this.
"We've got these powers, we're acting to save lives. If we had more powers, I think we'd save more lives."
The power to set drink-driving limits was among those transferred to Holyrood under the Scotland Act this year.
The consultation states that between three and 17 lives a year could be saved by introducing the new limit. This is based on evidence gathered in England and Wales for a review published by Sir Peter North last year which recommended the lower 50mg limit. Its findings were rejected by the Coalition Government.
Deputy Chief Constable Tom Ewing, who leads on road policing for the Association of Chief Police Officers in Scotland, backed the plan. He said the proposed 50mg limit would mean people could have no more than one drink before driving, but added: "The message should be: don't drink and drive."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article