THE brother of David Cameron's head of communications has told how he was court-martialled and fined by the Royal Navy for being gay.
Guy Oliver, 46, the son of Dr Ian Oliver, a former chief constable in Scotland, said his battle with the navy ended in a six-year-long legal case and that he was fined £1,000.
Not long afterwards, he added, anti-discrimination laws were introduced in the UK armed forces.
In a magazine interview Mr Oliver, whose brother, Craig, replaced Andy Coulson at Number 10 four years ago, said that when he was 16 he "shocked" his family by telling them he was joining the navy.
He said it represented independence to him and also that the navy would fund his university education.
When he joined the navy, he was affiliated to HMS Edinburgh, and served on the same ship as Prince Andrew.
But not long after finishing his degree, he told his captain that he wanted to leave the service.
The interior designer said yesterday: "While I loved my time in the navy, I knew I was living a lie.
"Initially, I didn't tell my captain or my parents the true reason for leaving, because, up until 1999, gay people were banned from the armed forces; if you were found out, you were court martialled.
"But in the end, the truth came out and I had to face the consequences."
His brother, by then a producer on ITV'S News at Ten, supported him when the navy took him to court - a gesture Mr Oliver says he will never forget.
"My battle with the navy ended in a six-year legal case and I was fined £1,000," he added. "Coincidentally, not long after, the law governing gay people in the UK's armed forces changed."
In the interview, Craig Oliver said of his brother: "Being up against the might of the Royal Navy wasn't easy.
"The court case that followed was tough and really made me see Craig in a different light.
"Watching him being grilled in court made me realise how brave he was. I really admired him for it, and what he was standing up for."
Their father Dr Ian Oliver was chief constable of Grampian Police before he was forced to resign in 1998 over the force's handling of a child murder inquiry.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article