EXPOSURE to two widely used pesticides is threatening the survival of bumblebees, scientists have found.
Research that aimed to mimic conditions in the countryside, where bees come into contact with numerous chemicals, found the combined effects of the pesticides significantly reduced the success of colonies.
Researchers from Royal Holloway, University of London exposed a common species of bumblebee (Bombus terrestris) to two types of pesticides, a pyrethroid and a neonicotinoid, over four weeks at levels they would encounter in the fields.
Using radio tagging to record the behaviour of bees from 40 colonies, which were allowed to forage outside, the researchers found workers from colonies exposed to the neonicotinoid pesticide were less efficient at foraging, particularly collecting pollen.
They were 55% more likely to get lost and not return to the colony than those not exposed to either pesticide, the study published in the journal Nature found.
Even though more bees were spending more time foraging, there was less pollen and they spent less time looking after their young, which combined to lead to fewer worker bees being produced.
In colonies exposed to the pyrethroid, four times as many bees were found dead in the nest as in the groups that did not come into contact with either chemical.
Where the bees were given access to both of the pesticides, they suffered from both higher death rates among the worker bees and less successful foraging, reducing the success of the colony and even making it more likely to fail altogether.
Dr Nigel Raine, who led the study, said: "There is an urgent need to understand the reasons behind current bee declines as they are essential pollinators of many agricultural crops and wild flowers."
He said pesticide usage was currently approved on tests that examined single pesticides.
"However, our evidence shows the risk of exposure to multiple pesticides needs to be considered, as this can seriously affect colony success," he said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article