THE parents of a boy who died of burns after becoming soaked in petrol on Good Friday have threatened to sue Aberdeen City Council.
The family of seven-year-old Preston Flores, who died in hospital from 85% burns five days after the incident in which he was engulfed in flames, say the local authority was responsible for leaving a canister of petrol unattended and unsecured in a council van near their home in Bedford Avenue.
In an interview with a Sunday newspaper, the boy's mother Luisza, 32, described seeing her son running towards their house on fire from the neck downwards, a scene that she said would haunt her forever.
She said: "I was trying to keep calm but all the time I was thinking, 'Please, this can't be happening.'"
Meanwhile, Preston's father Keith Will, 32, spoke of their vigil in hospital in Aberdeen and later Edinburgh's Hospital for Sick Children where they learned he was unlikely to survive.
"Preston fought for a few days but the surgeon said it was the worst thing he had ever seen happen to a young boy in 28 years doing the job.
"We eventually realised it was only going to be a matter of time. It was very tough. We told him how much we loved him and how much his brothers and sisters loved him. He didn't deserve what happened to him."
Mrs Flores said: "The van should have been more secure. It was left unattended, even though there were lots of dangerous goods in there.
"There's no way the council should have left petrol in the back of a van when there were kids around. It makes me very angry and we want to sue them for it."
A spokesman for Aberdeen City Council said he could not comment while police inquiries were incomplete, but confirmed the local authority had launched an internal investigation.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article