DOCKING the tails of working dogs by a third while they are puppies could significantly decrease their risk of injury, according to research.
A survey of more than 1000 owners of working dogs found more than half of undocked spaniels experienced a tail injury of some sort in the last year.
The study from the University of Glasgow was commissioned by the Scottish Government as it considers a change in the law.
Gamekeepers campaigned outside the Scottish Parliament earlier this year to end the ban on tail docking of working dogs.
The Scottish Gamekeepers Association has presented a 4158-signature petition to Environment Secretary Richard Lochhead, calling for the ban to be reversed for working dogs on the grounds of animal welfare.
The researchers at the University of Glasgow concluded docking at a young age would reduce the risk of injury.
A second study from the same group looked at records of working breed tail injuries from veterinary practices across Scotland. It suggests that to prevent one tail injury between 81 and 135 pointer, spaniel and hunt point retriever puppies would need to be docked.
Mr Lochhead is seeking the views of different organisations on the latest reports.
He said: "I must stress that I have as yet taken no firm stance on this; we need to gain a clearer understanding of the views of interested parties in Scotland before any decision is made. I have therefore invited key interested parties to consider the findings of this research."
Docking was outlawed in 2007, with penalties of a fine of up to £5000 and/or six months imprisonment. Exemptions are only made where a tail is injured or diseased.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article