The Justice Secretary has called for the transfer of more powers over drink-driving, before a debate at Holyrood this week on plans to reduce the limit.
MSPs will debate the Scottish Government's proposals to lower the existing blood/alcohol limit of 80mg/100ml to 50 mg/100ml, which are currently the subject of a public consultation.
Kenny MacAskill has written to UK Transport Secretary Patrick McLoughlin asking for the devolution of additional powers over breath testing, drink-drive penalties and differential limits.
"We wanted a package to be devolved that would allow us to consider whether the police should be able to carry out breath testing of drivers any time, anywhere, and powers to consider changing the penalties for drink-driving," Mr MacAskill said.
"We also called for the chance to consider differential drink-driving limits. For example, for young and novice drivers.
Mr MacAskill's plea comes after the Reported Road Casualties Scotland 2011 report showed an estimated 750 casualties including 20 deaths were due to drink-drive accidents in 2010.
A debate on the Scottish Government's proposals to reduce the drink-drive limit will be held on Thursday at Holyrood.
Mr MacAskill said: "We must take action to reduce the risk on our roads. We believe the current limit has had its day. The time is right for a change that will bring Scotland in line with the vast majority of Europe.
"As we enter the final phase of our consultation, I would urge as many people as possible to have their say before November 29."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article