OFFICIALS with concerns over the handling of Glasgow City Council's abandoned facelift of the city's George Square should be given whistleblower protection, opposition leaders claim.
The call comes after it emerged the Labour leader of the council faces accusations of misconduct over the project, which, if proved, could end his career.
The accusations are based on the claims of a former senior council officer, who has lodged a complaint with Scotland's ethics watchdog claiming Gordon Matheson violated the Councillors' Code of Conduct during a design competition for the £15 million project.
Mr Matheson remains confident of being cleared, but faces claims of interfering in a legally-binding procurement process, improper bias, attempted staff coercion and trying to steer the contest towards his favoured design.
The complaint was sent last week to the Public Standards Commissioner, who has the power to disqualify councillors, by the Royal Incorporation of Architects in Scotland (RIAS), the body that ran the £100,000 design competition.
It includes claims from Kerr Robertson, an RIAS member who, until his retirement a few weeks ago, was the council's lead architect and projects director.
Mr Robertson claims that, despite the contest having to comply with EU procurement law, he was told six weeks before the final judging began that "Gordon Matheson [would] be allowed to choose the winning design" and was told "to ensure the other jury members would fall into line with this".
Revelations of the complaint have led to calls from the SNP and Tories for Mr Matheson to stand down, with internal pressure also mounting ahead of the Glasgow Labour Group agm on May 13.
Graeme Hendry, leader of the SNP group, said: " I am calling on Councillor Matheson to give a personal assurance that neither he, nor anyone on his behalf, will try to intimidate anyone else who may come forward to whistleblow on his or anyone else's behaviour over George Square.
"I would encourage any officers current or past who feel rules have been broken to come forward. There is no doubt that Councillor Matheson has damaged Glasgow's reputation by his actions. With the Commonwealth Games coming up, he should act in the best interests of this great city and let someone whose probity isn't in question lead us into the Games."
The Herald also understands the RIAS briefed several political parties about the George Square complaint before submitting it to the Standards Commission.
A council spokesman said: "The RIAS is clear it has no evidence of anyone attempting to improperly influence the jury. What is clear is that there was no public appetite for a radical redesign of George Square and that whichever design won we would have gone with the public's view."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article