A FORMER judge who is chair of the new press watchdog has come under fire during a heated first public meeting of the new regulator.
Sir Alan Moses, who presided over the Soham murders trial, faced criticism over the role of the new Independent Press Standards Organisation (Ipso).
Hacked Off, the campaign group demanding statutory press regulation, was due to take part in Monday night's debate Edinburgh Napier University but pulled out at the last minute.
In a statement it claimed Ipso, which is replacing the Press Complaints Commission, was no more than a "fake regulator".
The group said: "Hacked Off sees Ipso for what it is, an outright rejection of the Leveson Report. The Leveson report was the product of a 15-month public inquiry into press regulation and was - via a Royal Charter - overwhelmingly endorsed in the Westminster Parliament and endorsed in the Scottish Parliament."
Following yesterday's court verdicts, Brian Cathcart, of Hacked Off, said Rupert Murdoch's UK newspapers should now abandon their plans - with other newspapers and magazines - to establish Ipso and sign up to the Royal Charter agreed by the three main political parties.
"For years the Murdoch press clung to the story that one rogue reporter was responsible for phone hacking. We now know this was a lie. Far from being an isolated incident involving a few 'bad apples', the trial has shown that the entire orchard was rotten," he said.
"The trial also shone a light on the appalling, systemic newsroom culture of bullying, lies, intimidation and intrusion that has devastated the lives of many people. From royalty and Cabinet ministers to victims of crime and bereaved families, nobody was safe."
Sir Alan declined to comment on the hacking case. However, he has vowed to make himself an unpopular figure in the industry, suggesting this would be proof the new set-up is working. News UK said that they had put in place measures to ensure that the wrongdoing could not happen again.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article