A LEGAL challenge to government plans to appoint a named guardian for every child in Scotland has been lodged in court.
MSPs approved legislation earlier this year that will mean everyone up to the age of 18 will have a "named person" - such as a health worker or headteacher - assigned to look out for their welfare and wellbeing.
The No To Named Persons (NO2NP) group, spearheaded by the Christian Institute, yesterday lodged legal papers at the Court of Session in Edinburgh.
Lawyers for the group have already written a letter informing the Government they are seeking a judicial review of section four of the Children and Young People (Scotland) Act.
Campaigners say the blanket nature of the named person provisions "constitutes a disproportionate and unjustified interference with the right to respect for individual family's right to a private and family life", and claim it could be in breach of the European Convention on Human Rights.
But the Scottish Government said the legislation was supported by a large majority of those who responded to the public consultation as well as a wide range of children's charities.
Children's Minister Aileen Campbell has rejected claims the measure will introduce "state snoopers".
But Simon Calvert, deputy director of the Christian Institute, said: "It's strange that a government so committed to independence should be taking it away from families in this way."
Campaigners are awaiting a date for an initial hearing, and believe the process will take months to complete.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article