The UK's television industry "risks becoming a victim of its own success" after a string of companies were bought up by giant US media conglomerates, according to Channel 4 boss David Abraham.
He said the arrival of large firms like MTV Viacom, which recently bought Channel 5 for £450 million, and the sale of scores of independent production companies was a threat to the system that made them successful in the first place.
One such firm, All3Media, which makes shows including Skins and Midsomer Murders recently accepted a £550m offer from US firm Liberty Global which owns Virgin Media and US entertainment group Discovery.
Giving the keynote James MacTaggart Memorial Lecture at the Edinburgh International Television Festival, he said the UK's free-to-air channels had become "the must-have accessories, the tiny dogs of 2014, amongst US media companies".
Mr Abraham said: "I believe that it's the brilliance of how we, in this country, have balanced public and private risk taking that has set free the creativity and talent that the Americans are so keen to invest in."
Using the example of the 1990 BBC drama House Of Cards which was recently re-made to huge critical and commercial acclaim by streaming service Netflix, he said: "Would Netflix, for example, have bought a show about a murderous politician who broke the 'fourth wall' of drama if the BBC hadn't taken that risky decision, decades before?"
He went on to say: "My second point is that this system now risks becoming a victim of its own success.
"While UK production is an undoubted commercial success story, I wonder if it will continue to be a creative one.
"Scale demands an increased focus on cost-cutting and margins."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article