Former Liberal Democrat leader Charles Kennedy has said he plans to remain involved in politics despite becoming another high profile scalp at the hands of the SNP.
He was beaten into second place in the Ross, Skye and Lochaber constituency by Nationalist Ian Blackford, who won with 20,119 votes, a majority of 5,124.
Mr Kennedy, who got 14,995 votes, said serving as an MP had been the "greatest privilege" of his public life.
After the result was announced, he said: "I'll obviously personally be sorry not to be a voice in the Commons contributing to that debate.
"Although I certainly intend to continue to contribute in whatever way possible to the wider political debate and the activity of the Liberal Democrats.
"The greatest privilege of my public life over these past 32 years has to be being entrusted with the responsibility of representing this constituency.
"That is thanks to a generation and more of voters who have extended that trust to me and I hope looking back over those 32 years they will feel that it was trust well placed."
Mr Kennedy was one of several high profile Lib Dem casualties at the hands of the Scottish nationalists during a dismal night for Nick Clegg's party.
Both Business Secretary Vince Cable and Chief Secretary to the Treasury Danny Alexander lost their seats, although Scottish Secretary Alistair Carmichael managed to hold on to his.
Having taken his party to its best election result since the 1920s, Mr Kennedy's leadership ended when he was forced to quit after admitting a drink problem.
His tenure at the top of the party was marked by his opposition to the 2003 invasion of Iraq, which helped propel them to their best result in more than 80 years with 62 seats.
But in 2006, he announced he was calling a leadership contest after confessing he had been receiving treatment for an alcohol problem.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article