Chief Whip Andrew Mitchell admits swearing at No 10 police officers but insists he did not call them "plebs", it was reported today.
The Tory enforcer concedes that he said "f******" when a member of Scotland Yard's Diplomatic Protection Group, SO6, refused to let him cycle out through the main Downing Street gates.
Mr Mitchell is reported to have said: "Look, I'm the chief whip, I work at Number 9 (Downing Street)," before muttering: "You guys are supposed to f****** help us."
An unnamed friend of the minister told the Sunday Telegraph: "He does not dispute he lost it a bit. It was in frustration at the episode and not aimed directly at the officers. It was the fourth time he had been at Downing Street that day - he is frequently allowed to use the main gate on his bike. He is absolutely not accusing anyone of lying."
When allegations about the tirade were published on Friday, Mr Mitchell issued a statement denying using "any of the words that have been reported".
The friend added: "He realises there may be differing versions of what was said but he is adamant he did not use the words he is reported to have used."
Mr Mitchell has faced calls to resign over the angry rant, which proved acutely embarrassing for Prime Minister David Cameron when details emerged as he headed to Manchester on Friday to pay his respects to murdered Pcs Nicola Hughes and Fiona Bone.
Mr Cameron was told to take responsibility for the Tory enforcer's behaviour by the widow of murdered police officer Sharon Beshenivsky and Labour called on him to "urgently" review the evidence.
Paul Beshenivsky, whose wife was killed on duty in Bradford, West Yorkshire, in November 2005, told Sky News: "David Cameron should be responsible for what his ministers say, they are his ministers and they are working with him.
"Ministers shouldn't be going round foul-mouthing police officers, especially under the current circumstances."
John Tully, chairman of the Metropolitan Police Federation, has called on Mr Mitchell to quit over his "abusive" outburst.
But seasoned politician Ken Clarke, minister without portfolio, defended his colleague
He said: "I have known Andrew for a long time and he is a perfectly reasonable, courteous man with the same high regard for the police services as anyone else.
"He obviously had a flare of bad temper on this occasion and has rightly apologised. I do think this should be allowed to set the matter at rest."
Mr Mitchell, a keen cyclist, was reported by the Sun to also have called the police "morons".
"Best you learn your f****** place. You don't run this f****** Government. You're f****** plebs," it reported him as saying.
In a statement on Friday the Tory, who was also a minister under John Major in the early 1990s, said: "On Wednesday night I attempted to leave Downing Street via the main gate, something I have been allowed to do many times before.
"I was told that I was not allowed to leave that way. While I do not accept that I used any of the words that have been reported, I accept I did not treat the police with the respect they deserve.
"I have seen the supervising sergeant and apologised, and will also apologise to the police officer involved."
Deputy Liberal Democrat leader Simon Hughes said it was "never good" for a public figure to be disrespectful to the police.
He said: "I wasn't there and I don't know exactly what happened and there appears to be some dispute as to exactly what happened.
"Clearly it is never good if any person in public office is shown to be disrespectful of the police.
"The police aren't always perfect, they don't always get everything right but there's a basic principle we should follow which is that the police are there to be respected because of the amazingly important work they do for us.
"At this time, of all times, still in the seven days following the death of two police constables on duty, I think the message has to be that we respect the police and we don't lose our tempers with them."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article