AS that good friend of the Doctor, the Brigadier, once said when faced with the Time Lord's regeneration: "Here we go again".
Except this time, after four painful years of Matt Smith, the BBC appears to have got it right with Peter Capaldi.
It is the choice of age before youth, tall before short and Scottish before English (which has worked several times before).
The previous Scottish Doctors were Sylvester McCoy and David Tennant, but what Capaldi has over both of them is age.
He is 55, older than any of the other actors to play the role other than William Hartnell, who was also 55 when he was cast as the first Doctor in 1963.
That means the casting of Capaldi is a kind of return - the show that travels in time has looped back to the best place to find inspiration: the beginning.
As Stephen Hawking, who is right about most things, put it: "William Hartnell was older and that gave him an air of authority other Doctors lacked." Capaldi has the same potential.
But as well as age and the dignified air of a few grey hairs, there's something else that's promising about Capaldi - something we saw in The Thick of It and will hopefully see in Doctor Who. It's a madness, an anger, the feeling of an alien among humans.
It's a quality the greatest Doctor, Tom Baker, certainly had and I wonder if Stephen Moffat, who runs the show, is trying to summon those glory days again. It would be no bad thing.
Finally, Capaldi has also one other quality in his favour. When he was 15-years-old, and living in Glasgow, he wrote to the Radio Times and described his love of Doctor Who. All the best actors who have played the Doctor had that love, all the best of them saw it as more than a job. The choice may not have been a surprise (bookies can time-travel, it seems) but it is promising.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article