THE Church of Scotland has offered assurances to members worried about the accuracy of the electronic voting system used in a recent Kirk ballot on gay clergy.
It follows concerns from some presbyteries that the system was flawed and their votes might not have been counted.
The issue arose when some members who took part in the vote at the General Assembly last month received letters refusing their expenses claiming they had not been present. This created concerns that members who had been presented might not have had their votes counted as well.
The Church has now investigated the matter and claims all votes were registered correctly as the systems for voting and registering attendance are separate.
The Kirk also claims that the issue over attendance was down to "user error".
John Cunningham, the clerk at Lewis Presbytery, one of the ministries to raise concerns, said: "We had two commissioners who received letters saying that they hadn't logged in, therefore weren't able to claim expenses, but they had been there and several people could confirm that and we had some concerns that their votes might note have been lodged too.
"We've now had confirmation that the devices were checked and the issue with logging in is down to human error so we're happy with that and we're not pursuing it any further."
A Church of Scotland spokesman refused to confirm exactly how many complaints it had received about the voting system, however it is understood to have been in double figures.
Rev Dr Derek Browning, convener of the Assembly Arrangements Committee, said: "After questions were asked about voting and attendance recording at the 2015 General Assembly, the Assembly Arrangements Committee initiated a thorough review of the technology used.
"Having carried out extensive checks, the Assembly Arrangements Committee is satisfied that the electronic attendance and voting system was fully operational at the General Assembly.
"In relation to queries concerning attendance recording, our conclusion indicates this was down to 'user error'. This may have been caused by commissioners forgetting to register attendance, or pressing more than one button at the same time, or pressing one of the non-number buttons.
"With a view to remedying this problem, the Assembly Arrangements Committee will be recommending that in future years only one specific numbered button will be used to record attendance."
Delegates voted 309 in favour and 183 against allowing congregations to appoint clergy in same-sex civil partnerships.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article