NEARLY three-quarters of people referred to foodbanks are destitute because of problems related to the benefits system, according to Citizens Advice Scotland (CAS).
The charity said it had referred more than 400 people to a foodbank in January, the highest monthly figure yet recorded.
CAS revealed the figures as MSPs prepare to debate foodbanks today. It said 30% of its referrals were because the person's benefit had been delayed and a further 22% had been penalised for alleged breaches of the rules. Another 14% had lost money after benefits were re-assessed; while 7% were affected by the so-called 'bedroom tax' which reduces housing benefit for those deemed to occupy homes too large for their needs.
CAS policy manager Keith Dryburgh commended the work of organisations such as the Trussell Trust which run foodbanks.
"But food parcels don't address the underlying problem of poverty, and should not be seen as a long-term solution to it," he said.
"The government's policies are leaving many people without the vital safety net that the welfare system is meant to provide. People should not need to go to a CAB or a food-bank because they have no money, and yet this is what CAB advisers see every week."
A UK Government spokesman said: "The benefits system supports millions of people who are on low incomes or unemployed and there is no robust evidence that welfare reforms are linked to increased use of food banks. In fact, our welfare reforms will improve the lives of some of the poorest families in our communities."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article