SENIOR officials contracted by Scotland's largest council to deliver a multi-million 'smart cities' project have been dismissed, it has been reported.
Five of the most senior executives delivering the Future Cities programme were told their contracts were being terminated early after bidding for further work while still working for Glasgow City Council.
It has been claimed council staff and other officials connected with the £24million UK Government-funded scheme arrived at the Future Cities headquarters late last week and told the five to hand over security passes and pack their belongings.
They were then escorted from the building.
It is alleged they were removed because they had set up an organisation, called Urban Tide, to do similar projects, including winning a contract for a Scottish Government study on smart cities.
Sources claim the five, including Future Cities director Michael McLaughlin were not dismissed for carrying out other work but for allegations they were bidding for contracts elsewhere without disclosing it to the city council.
Allegations the project has caused friction at the council have also been played down.
Funded by Westminster's Technology Strategy Board, the Future Cities project aims to showcase 'digitally-enabled urban design', from use of apps to access city services and data to new "intelligent street lights".
Outside contractors make up about half the 38-person Future Cities group. The rest are secondees from the council and from Access, a for-profit limited liability partnership. It is jointly owned by the council and Serco. A spokesman for the council said only: "A number of contractors who were engaged in the programme have reached the end of their contracts."
Sources with the Future Cities team have claimed the council had tried to present the team as employees of the authority, with many actually running their own private companies.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article