SCOTLAND'S capital has been praised for setting a target of achieving its deadline of reducing carbon emissions by 40% by 2020, while other UK cities have not done so.
Edinburgh ultimately wants to achieve a zero carbon economy by 2050.
But research by Newcastle University found many major population centres are failing to implement plans to deal with climate change, such as reducing emissions and planning for extreme weather.
A study of 30 cities found that all of the authorities acknowledged that climate change was a threat and all but two had a strategy in place to reduce emissions but the lack of a target, figure or timescale, rendered them meaningless, according to the report. It claims that many of the cities lack long-term investment in the strategies.
Dr Oliver Heidrich, who led the research, said: "Of the 30 cities we assessed, all of them acknowledged that climate change was a threat and all except two had a strategy or policy in place to reduce emissions and also adapt to cope better with future weather patterns, in particular flooding.
"But a plan is only any good if you implement it and then assess it to see how effective it has been. This requires a long-term investment in the strategies.
"We found that in many cities this wasn't happening. In some cases, plans were in place but nothing had been done about them."
The study gave London and Leicester the highest scores and Wrexham and Derry the lowest.
WWF Scotland director Lang Banks said: "It's great to see Edinburgh highlighted as one of those cities that has at least set a deadline to reduce climate emissions.
"However, it's vital that along with any targets are clear city-wide policies on transport, waste and energy that will deliver the agreed cuts in pollution."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article