At the end of December, a popular television series chronicling China's most famous empress suddenly went on a four-day hiatus.
When it returned on New Year's Day, the low-cut necklines and squeezed bosoms had vanished.
Instead, the screen was filled with close-up shots showing only the heads of the female characters in the period piece, which depicts the seventh-century Tang Dynasty, an era when a woman's beauty was defined partly by plumpness.
No one has claimed responsibility for the awkward cropping, but it is widely believed to be the work of the country's prudish censors.
The changes have drawn a wave of mockery from the public fed up with ham-handed censorship. Chinese have lit up social media with complaints and jokes, with some posting cropped photos of celebrities and drawings that add in the missing cleavages to show the absurdity of the cuts.
"It was not a public issue, but has become one after shameless officials wielded their powerful administrative powers," Ren Zhiqiang, a businessman who has been outspoken on social issues, wrote on his microblog.
"What people are concerned about is not cleavage, but that a bunch of cultural hooligans are in charge of making approvals."
Calls to the State Administration of Press, Publication, Radio, Film and Television were unanswered. The administration does not always issue its decrees publicly, issuing its orders instead directly to publishers and producers.
In recent years, the regulating agency has issued a series of edicts, saying TV programming should be wholesome and avoid smutty material that would corrupt social morals. It has banned plots that involve one-night stands, wife-swapping, female protagonists falling in love with more than one man and the use of sex in military espionage.
Bizarrely, authorities have also banned plots with time travel, a move they say is aimed at preserving historical integrity.
The risque necklines in The Empress Of China were the latest images to fall under the agency's cleaver.
The 80-episode series tells the story of Wu Zetian, who was a concubine to a Tang emperor but ascended to the apex of power and ruled officially under her self-proclaimed Zhou Dynasty. She is the only recorded woman to rule China in her own right and has been the subject of many television and film productions.
The empress was played by Fan Bingbing, a rising star who has appeared in the 2014 Hollywood blockbuster X-Men.
The series has lavish costumes with the low necklines believed to have been commonplace in the age of Wu, and all 80 episodes already had been produced when the changes were imposed after 17 episodes were aired.
In one survey by the industry research group Zero Power Intelligence, nearly 40 percent say the cuts were too prudish, though another quarter of the 13,768 respondents said the show was now appropriate for all ages.
The hubbub prompted at least two Communist Party-run newspapers this week to call for the introduction of ratings into Chinese television programmes and films.
"If there were ratings, then The Empress Of China would not need the redo," the Liaoning Daily wrote. "Now it has re-emerged with the bosoms covered up, yet the coy attitude has become an even bigger joke."
The party-run Henan Daily said that while the show was now suitable for all ages, "it has lost its edge".
Shi Shusi, a Beijing-based commentator, called it another example of the abuse of power.
"It's absurd that the authorities should make such a ruling when a few old cadres are upset with The Empress Of China,'" he said. "It's time we put powers in a cage so there will be sensible decision-making and management to prevent such a farce from happening again."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article