BRITAIN is failing to make the most of the opportunity to become a world leader in offshore wind energy, a new report from an influential think tank has warned.
The Westminster Government is also accused of sending weak and unclear signals on renewables which could leave the industry with high costs but few jobs.
In particular there has been a failure to attract turbine manufacturers, the left-leaning Institute of Public Policy Research (IPPR) found in its report.
Environmentalists say it underlines the need for the Scottish Government to do what it can to get firms to locate north of the Border.
The report says the UK has ideal building conditions, with large areas of seabed in shallow waters, close to shore, but warns the Government is not doing enough to bring down costs and secure domestic jobs in offshore wind.
It says the Government has backtracked on its ambition to secure 18 gigawatts (GW) of offshore wind by 2020 and expects just 4.4GW to come online between 2020 and 2030.
It adds that the industry risks missing out on an extra 15,000 jobs that could be created by 2020 and that the UK Government needs to attract at least two turbine manufacturers, preferably more.
The report says that, while failure to do so would not be fatal to the prospect of a strong domestic supply chain, success would be a boost. This is because these firms are able to attract a cluster of other companies further down the supply chain, like in Denmark.
Will Straw, associate director at IPPR, said: "The UK's current policy trajectory could see it achieving the worst of all worlds: low volume, low jobs, and high costs.
"Unless Britain pumps up the volume there is little prospect of either bringing down the costs of offshore wind or creating domestic jobs."
He said an alternative strategy for the sector was needed based on carrots and sticks.
A 2030 target for renewables in the power sector is a necessary condition, as are long-term 20 year contracts, he claims. But he said developers must be expected to drive down costs with the correct subsidy regime, and do more to provide apprenticeships and sponsor university and further education courses.
A Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) spokeswoman said: "Offshore wind, built in the right place, is an important contributor to our energy mix and we expect to see more capacity built through to 2020 and beyond.
"We have provided certainty to offshore wind investors by confirming the level of support available under the Renewables Obligation and, earlier than expected, publishing draft strike prices for contracts in the future electricity market."
She said the ranges set out were not targets but indicative estimates of the contribution offshore wind could make and added: "We are continually enhancing our understanding of each sector's potential in the context of likely demand.
WWF Scotland director Lang Banks said the report was a shot across the bows of the Coalition. He added: "It also reinforces the need for Scottish Ministers to do all they can to encourage turbine manufacturers to locate here and capitalise on the existing offshore oil and gas expertise in Aberdeen and the north of Scotland."
He said studies estimated Scotland's offshore wind industry could create 28,000 jobs by 2020 and contribute over £7 billion of investment to the economy.
A Scottish Government spokeswoman said: "This report further endorses the call by Scottish Ministers to their UK counterparts urging them to set a decarbonisation target now rather than waiting until 2016.
"Unless the UK Government acts now to address this issue, projects coming on to the system before 2020 are likely to be at high cost and there could well be an investment hiatus for projects coming on after 2020 and as a result the UK misses out on a real opportunity to maximise its offshore wind potential."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article