A LOCAL community has hit out at the Forestry Commission over a proposal to sell off woodland to a private developer as part of the sale of an historic Highland castle.
Residents in Culrain believe the Forestry Commission Scotland (FCS) has an "in-principle agreement" to sell of 100 acres of land to a developer who plans to purchase former youth hostel Carbisdale Castle.
They claim the public land is currently used by locals for recreation and should not be sold on to a private enterprise.
FCS say that while they have entered discussions with the developer, they have not yet reached a decision on whether or not to sell up.
Culrain and District Hall Committee secretary Anne Henderson claimed FCS is not acting in the best interests of Scotland's forests or its people.
She said: "We're at a loss as to why the Forestry Commission is not protecting the land this community has nurtured and invested in for so long.
"It's immoral behaviour which seems to be serving the developer's interests, not those of the community, or the woodland itself.
"We applaud the sale of the castle and would love to see it flourish for many years to come, but the forest land is and should remain detached from the castle. The two should not be packaged up together in a deal to satisfy a mysterious private developer."
A spokesman for FCS said: "We have been approached by a developer about a possible purchase of an area of the National Forest Estate as part of wider plans for the re-development of the neighbouring Carbisdale Castle.
"Preliminary discussions with the developer have taken place, however, as yet we have not agreed the extent or boundaries of a potential area or whether any sale is in the public interest.
"We are aware of some local community concerns about the potential sale and the developer is organising a meeting with all the interested parties to discuss the proposal.
"We hope this meeting provides an opportunity to hear about the proposals and share their initial thoughts."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article