THE future of the golden eagle in Scotland is being threatened by plans to plant millions of trees, a conservation body has warned.
The Scottish Gamekeepers' Association (SGA) believes the bird is at threat from government plans to plant thousands of acres of forestry every year.
Alex Hogg, the chairman of the SGA, also said the bird of prey was at risk from an increase in wind turbines.
He said: "Probably the biggest new threat to golden eagle survival comes from the government's own forestry and energy strategy. By 2050, the Scottish Government plans to cover much of Scotland's open hills in trees, despite knowing that eagles require open habitat for feeding.
"Scotland will not look like the country it is now. It will look more like Norway."
There are around 431 pairs of golden eagles in Scotland.
The RSPB has argued that the eagle is now entirely confined to remote areas of the country, such as the mountains and glens of the west coast and on the Western Isles.
In 2010, ministers set a goal of planting 100 million trees by 2015.
About 40 million have been planted to date.
A statement from the Scottish Government said: "Our woodland planting targets could actually benefit golden eagles as one of the major difficulties facing this species is a lack of suitable prey and evidence shows that the careful location and design of new woodland areas can help increase the availability of prey animals.
"Scottish ministers fully consider all environmental impacts in consultation with Scottish Natural Heritage, RSPB and others before deciding whether or not to grant consent for wind farm developments."
A 2008 report by Scottish Natural Heritage acknowledged that the planting of new trees was a potential constraint to the breeding of golden eagles.
Mr Hogg added: "Within the next few decades, the golden eagle in Scotland will have nowhere to expand its range."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article